Skip to content
MAXERA Rechtsanwälte

Insurance Law

Riester annuity factor cut

Your insurer has reduced the annuity factor in your Riester contract, cutting your future pension. On 10 December 2025 the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled that an adjustment clause is invalid if it entitles the insurer to reduce the factor without requiring it to raise the factor again once circumstances improve (IV ZR 34/25). We review your contract documents in Augsburg.

5.0

reviews on Google & anwalt.de

10,000+

clients successfully represented

Specialist lawyer

Specialisation instead of general advice

35+ years of experience in the team

Riester annuity factor cut

What the annuity factor determines in your Riester contract

The annuity factor states how much monthly pension your insurer pays for every €10,000 of policy value. It is set out in your policy document. The pension is calculated by dividing the policy value by €10,000 and multiplying the result by this factor.

A certified Riester contract guarantees the contributions you have paid in: the provider commits that, at the start of the payout phase, at least the retirement contributions paid in remain available (§ 1(1) sentence 1 no. 3 AltZertG). How much monthly pension results from that capital is decided by the annuity factor.

If the factor falls, the pension falls in the same proportion. The policy value itself remains unchanged.

BGH ruling of 10 December 2025 on the annuity factor clause

On 10 December 2025 the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled on an injunction claim under the UKlaG (IV ZR 34/25). The claimant was an association registered under § 4 UKlaG, suing a life insurer; the lower courts were Stuttgart Regional Court (53 O 214/22) and Stuttgart Higher Regional Court (2 U 143/23).

The court held invalid a clause in the conditions of a unit-linked Riester pension policy that entitles the insurer to reduce the annuity factor when life expectancy has risen sharply or the return on the underlying investments has fallen sharply, without obliging the insurer to raise the factor again once those circumstances later improve. The standard applied was § 308 no. 4 and § 307(1) sentence 1 BGB. Whether § 163 VVG also applies was left open.

Establishing whether the factor was cut in your own contract

Whether your annuity factor has been reduced follows from your own documents. You need the policy document, the annual statements and the insurance conditions. The conditions show under what circumstances the insurer was entitled to change the factor at all.

Comparing the policy document with the annual statement

The policy document states the annuity factor promised when the contract was concluded, usually as an amount per €10,000 of policy value. Compare it with the factor shown in your current annual statement. If the current figure is lower, the factor has been reduced.

Then check the insurance conditions to see whether the adjustment clause obliges the insurer to raise the factor again once circumstances improve. If that obligation is missing, the clause matches the version objected to by the BGH.

Which adjustment clauses the ruling covers

The judgment of 10 December 2025 covers clauses that allow a reduction without obliging the insurer to raise the factor again once circumstances improve. A clause that does contain this obligation was not objected to by the Senate.

Individual policyholders have also taken action on their own. On 8 February 2023 Cologne Regional Court found that the reduction of an agreed annuity factor of €37.34 per €10,000 was not effective and declared the reduction clause invalid (case no. 26 O 12/22). The clause deviated from § 163 VVG to the policyholder’s disadvantage, which § 171 VVG prohibits.

Claims for the guaranteed annuity factor and arrears

If the adjustment clause is invalid, the guaranteed annuity factor promised in the policy document continues to apply unchanged. Two claims follow from this: a declaration of that factor, and payment of the arrears on pensions paid out at too low a rate.

Establishing the original annuity factor

First, we call on the insurer in writing to confirm that the annuity factor originally agreed applies to your contract. If no confirmation follows, a declaratory action follows.

Under § 256(1) ZPO, a claim for a declaration on the existence of a legal relationship may be brought where the claimant has a legal interest in a prompt judicial decision. This is the route the policyholder took in the Cologne proceedings.

Arrears and limitation under §§ 195, 199 BGB

If you are already receiving a pension based on the reduced factor, your claim covers the difference for every month since the reduction. Once the insurer is in default, interest of five percentage points above the base rate is added (§ 288(1) BGB).

The standard limitation period is three years (§ 195 BGB). It begins at the end of the year in which the claim arose and you became aware, or without gross negligence should have become aware, of the facts giving rise to the claim and the identity of the debtor (§ 199(1) BGB). When that knowledge existed must be determined separately for each contract.

Further information

These topics may also be of interest:

This information does not constitute legal advice in an individual case.

Insurance Law

FAQ

Frequently asked questions: Insurance Law

How can I tell whether my annuity factor has been reduced?
Compare the annuity factor stated in your original policy document with the figure in your current annual statement. If the current figure is lower, the annuity factor has been reduced. If you cannot find the policy document, you can ask your insurer for the original figure.
What did the BGH decide on 10 December 2025?
The BGH held (IV ZR 34/25) that clauses in general insurance conditions entitling the insurer to reduce the annuity factor unilaterally are invalid. They breach § 308 no. 4 BGB (an unreasonable reservation to amend) and § 307(1) BGB (lack of symmetry: a reduction with no corresponding duty to raise the factor again).
Does the BGH ruling apply only to Riester contracts?
No. The judgment was given on a unit-linked Riester pension policy, but the principles apply to every type of contract with a comparable adjustment clause, including private unit-linked pension policies, Rürup contracts and pension fund contracts.
Which insurers are affected?
Reductions of the annuity factor are documented at Allianz (around 700,000 contracts), Zurich, AXA, LPV (Postbank), VHV and R+V. The list is not exhaustive. Any insurer with an adjustment clause in its general conditions that has reduced the annuity factor is potentially affected.
Can I get money back if my pension is already being paid at the reduced rate?
Yes. You are entitled to the difference between the reduced pension and the correctly calculated pension for every month since the reduction, plus default interest. The standard limitation period is three years from when you learned of the unlawful reduction.
What should I do now?
Check your policy document and your current annual statement for a change to the annuity factor. Gather all the documents and have your contract reviewed by a lawyer. The sooner you act, the more claims you can enforce before limitation takes effect.

Tell us about your situation. Free of charge.

You will receive an honest initial assessment from a lawyer, no hold music, no call centre. You decide afterwards whether to instruct us. Response within 24 hours.

Confidential. Non-binding. No cost risk.

Describe your situation

A free initial assessment by a lawyer. You will hear back within 24 hours. Only then do you decide, at your own pace, whether to instruct us.

Do you have legal expenses insurance? (optional)

We check free of charge whether your insurer will cover the case and handle the request for cover for you.

Confidential and without cost risk. Your data is transmitted encrypted and used solely to process your enquiry.