Schufa compensation for damages according to GDPR
Schufa compensation under the GDPR – enforcing your right to compensation
Incorrect or outdated Schufa entries cause real harm: rejected loan applications, loss of housing, and higher insurance premiums. Under Article 82 of the GDPR, data subjects have an independent right to compensation – both for financial losses and for psychological distress. In 2023, the ECJ clarified that any genuine emotional distress is sufficient. MAXERA assesses your claim, quantifies the damages and enforces compensation against Schufa and the reporting body.
Article 82 of the GDPR – Your right to compensation
Article 82(1) of the GDPR grants any person who suffers material or non-material damage as a result of a data protection breach a direct right to compensation against the controller. In the case of incorrect Schufa entries, there are two potential defendants: Schufa itself, which stores the entry and calculates the score, and the reporting company (bank, telecommunications provider, debt collection agency) that transmitted the incorrect data. Both may be jointly and severally liable. Article 82(3) of the GDPR reverses the burden of proof regarding fault: the controller must prove that they are not responsible for the breach.
Material and non-material damages – what are you entitled to?
Article 82 of the GDPR expressly covers both types of damage. Material damage encompasses any quantifiable financial loss: higher borrowing costs, more expensive insurance premiums, and lost rental income. Non-material damage (compensation for pain and suffering) covers stress, anxiety, reputational harm and a sense of powerlessness. In its judgment C-300/21 of 4 May 2023, the ECJ clarified that no materiality threshold applies – any actual emotional distress is sufficient. German courts, which had previously required a “significant impairment”, are thus superseded.
Tell us about your situation - without obligation and nationwide.
Compensation Check
Follow these 5 steps to check whether you are entitled to compensation due to a Schufa entry.
Typical cases and the extent of the damage
Claims for compensation against Schufa arise in recurring situations. The amount of compensation depends on the specific circumstances of each case – in particular on the nature and duration of the entry, as well as the demonstrable consequences. We will provide a realistic assessment of your claim and ensure it is upheld using the right arguments.
Loan application rejected due to an incorrect Schufa entry
A typical scenario: The bank refuses a loan due to a negative Schufa entry that is either factually incorrect or has long since been resolved but not deleted. The person affected is forced to resort to more expensive alternatives or forego the financing altogether. Financial loss: difference in interest rates or loss of benefit. Non-financial loss: stress, feelings of shame, anxiety about one’s livelihood. In such cases, courts frequently award between €1,000 and €5,000 in compensation for pain and suffering, in addition to the material damages.
Rejection of a flat application and increased insurance costs
Landlords and insurers routinely check creditworthiness. An incorrect or out-of-date Schufa entry can lead to a tenancy being refused or to higher insurance premiums. The financial loss lies in the difference compared to the cheaper alternative (higher rent, more expensive insurance). The non-financial loss is particularly significant in the case of tenancy refusals – especially in tight housing markets, losing a flat can cause considerable personal hardship. Document every refusal in writing.
Enforcement and costs
The process of claiming compensation from Schufa follows a well-established procedure: documentation, request for deletion, formal warning, legal action. The sooner you seek legal assistance, the easier it will be to prove and quantify the damages. We handle every step of the process and provide you with clear information about costs and risks.
Procedure: Application for removal, formal notice, legal action
As a first step, we document the incorrect entry and submit a formal request for its removal to Schufa and the reporting body. Their response (or lack thereof) forms the basis for the claim for damages: if deletion is refused or delayed, this significantly strengthens your position. We then issue a formal warning letter setting out a quantified claim for damages. If the other party fails to act, we will bring the claim before the competent court.
Costs, legal protection and litigation funding
With legal expenses insurance covering contract law or data protection, you generally do not bear any financial risk. We obtain confirmation of cover before taking on the case. Without legal expenses cover, lawyers’ fees and court costs are based on the value of the claim. In the case of high claims for damages, there is also the option of litigation funding, whereby a financier assumes the cost risk and receives a share of the proceeds if the case is successful. We will advise you on the most economically sensible solution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Further information
You might also be interested in these topics:
This information does not constitute legal advice in individual cases.
MAXERA Lawyers support clients throughout Germany - digitally, efficiently and with a clear strategy.
Specialised, fast, clear
Our law firm in Augsburg's Maximilianstraße combines personal advice on site with digital client management. Whether labour law or insurance law - we employ specialist lawyers who not only know their field of law, but live it every day.
Call us, write to us or use the form - we will get back to you within 24 hours.
Describe the situation
Briefly describe your request - we will get back to you with an initial assessment.
